Politically Rational

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Does the President Want to Execute Members of Congress?

    “Does the President want to execute members of Congress?”

    This question was posed to Press Secretary Leavitt yesterday.  It is an absolutely shocking question to be asked at the White House, and it is even more shocking that it is a legitimate question.

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    Earlier this week, a group of lawmakers posted a video asking members of the American military and intelligence to disobey any illegal orders.

    It is part of the Manual for Courts Martial (Page IV-24, which is 334 of the PDF) , stating that an order must be inferred as lawful, but that such inference “does not apply to a patently illegal order, such as one that directs the commission of a crime.”  Moreover, in 1804 the Supreme Court ruled in Little v. Barreme that orders given cannot “legalize an act without which without those instructions would have been a plain trespass.”

    In direct response to their video, President Trump shared a Washington Examiner article on his Truth Social account and suggested this is seditious behavior, the people doing it are traitors, and they should be locked up.  He also shared numerous social media posts, including one calling for them to be hanged.

    The full answer to the question from Secretary Leavitt, which can be seen here, is this:

    “No. Many in this room want to talk about the president’s response, but not what brought the president to responding in this way.  To suggest and encourage that active duty service members defy the chain of command is a very dangerous thing for sitting members of Congress to do and they should be held accountable.  And that’s what the president wants to see.”

     

    Many are suggesting this comment clarifies the President’s position, but it is worth noting that all the posts shared here are still up on his Truth Social Account and he has not made any comments on the matter directly.

    Whether the video made by the democratic lawmakers was advisable, or insinuated that President Trump has been giving unlawful orders is debatable, though it is worth a reminder that when asked about the legality of striking boats in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, Vice President Vance himself simply stated, “I don’t give a shit”.

    What is not debatable is that the lawmakers in question only reiterated that our service members should not follow orders that are illegal, which is standard practice.  In fact, the Supreme Court explicitly stated in Little v. Barreme, “the instructions cannot change the nature of the transaction, or legalize an act which without those instructions would have been a plain trespass.”

    It can hardly be considered sedition or treason to suggest our service members follow the law.  Suggesting lawmakers be executed for such statements is bewildering.

    I remain shocked that we have come to the point where asking the question, “Does the President want to execute members of Congress?” is a legitimate question.

     

     

     

    Sources:

    Sen. Elissa Slotkin on X: “We want to speak directly to members of the Military and the Intelligence Community. The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution. Don’t give up the ship. https://t.co/N8lW0EpQ7r” / X

    Democratic lawmakers urge troops to disobey illegal orders | CNN Politics

    MCM (2024 ed) – TOC no index.pdf

    Little v. Barreme – Wikipedia

    Dem veterans in Congress urge service members to refuse unlawful orders

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-arrest-democrats-troops-illegal-orders-b2869176.html

    Trump Boosts Message Calling For Executing Democrats In Congress | HuffPost Latest News

    Video | Facebook

    White House defends Donald Trump remarks, says he does not want member of Congress executed

    Trump calls video by Democratic veterans in Congress ‘seditious behavior’ : NPR

    Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Truth Social

    U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats: What we know : NPR

    JD Vance blasts Trump critic in cartel killings debate: ‘I don’t give a s—‘ | Fox News

    LITTLE v. BARREME, 6 U.S. 170 (1804) | FindLaw

     

    November 21, 2025
  • Is Senator Grassley Paying Attention?

    It seems like now is a good time for a reminder of comments made by Senator Chuck Grassley back in February regarding President Trump disobeying court orders:  “He wouldn’t get away with that and shouldn’t.”

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion to this post.

    I first wrote about this administration’s seeming defiance of the judiciary back in February and many of the concerns I raised have simply increased since then.  Over the course of Trump’s second administration, we have seen a number of judicial rulings against the Trump Administration.  I want to highlight just a few recent cases.

    I hope Senator Grassley is paying attention.

    National Guard Troops in Portland:

    At the end of September, President Trump ordered national guard troops into Portland, Oregon.  On October 4th, a federal judge ruled it was illegal for the Oregon National Guard to be sent in.  Almost immediately, President Trump moved to send the California National Guard into Portland instead which was immediately determined to violate the previous order and also ruled illegal.  Now, a ruling has permanently blocked the President from using National Guard forces in Portland, partly because another court determined the administration erred about the facts while arguing their case in court.

    I hope Senator Grassley is paying attention.

    SNAP Benefits:

    Earlier this week, a judge ruled that the Trump administration must partially fund SNAP benefits.  Immediately following the ruling, Donald Trump posted that he would not fund those benefits.  After a review of his comments, the same judge who ruled on partial funding said the administration must provide those benefits in full.  After another appeal, that ruling has been paused for now by Justice Jackson of the Supreme Court in order to give an appeals court more time to make a ruling.

    I hope Senator Grassley is paying attention.

     

    Other Comments:

    I should note that each state has taken a different path on funding SNAP benefits.  Living in Iowa, I will note that Governor Reynolds has put forward $1 million for food banks during the lapse in SNAP benefits but only in the form of matching donations to Iowa’s six regional food banks while Iowa’s SNAP total is approximately $45 million per month.

     

     

    Sources:

    Grassley expects Trump to follow court orders on federal spending

    Blog – Page 11 of 12 – Politically Rational

    More than 100 judges have ruled against the Trump admin’s mandatory detention policy – POLITICO

    Trump says he is authorizing military to use ‘Full Force’ in Portland – POLITICO

    Illinois files a lawsuit to block Trump deploying the National Guard, joining Oregon | WBUR

    Pentagon says it is deploying California National Guard to Portland | Reuters

    Federal judge blocks federalized guard from deploying to Oregon – OPB

    Judge permanently blocks Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops to Portland – CBS News

    9th Circuit reverses victory for Trump admin after feds lied

    Trump administration says SNAP will be partially funded | AP News

    Trump links SNAP program restart to Democrat government shutdown decision | Fox News

    Judge orders Trump administration to fully fund SNAP benefits for November by Friday – CBS News

    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/11/07/us/trump-news-shutdown?unlocked_article_code=1.zk8.2jQ_.FKzDlz5tfMY1&smid=url-share

    SNAP benefits: These states will partially fund food stamps amid shutdown | FOX 13 Tampa Bay

    Reynolds pledges funding to assist food banks after SNAP funding expires | Iowa Public Radio

    Reynolds pledges funding to assist food banks after SNAP funding expires | Iowa Public Radio

    State Data | Iowa Food Bank Association

    SNAP benefits to run out amid government shutdown. Here’s what to know

     

    November 8, 2025
  • Another Week of Chaos

    We have seen yet another week (or slightly more) of total chaos in the United States government: from nationwide protests to the demolition of part of the White House to one of the longest government shutdowns we’ve ever seen, the news keeps coming at a pace that is difficult to keep up with.

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    National Guard and Portland

    This week, an appeals court ruled that Donald Trump can deploy the National Guard in Portland. The President does have the authority to deploy the national guard in the event there is “rebellion or danger of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.” The President’s legal team essentially argued that he alone has the authority to determine the facts and whether there is danger of rebellion.

    Mike Johnson vs Adelita Grijalva

    On September 24th, Adelita Grijalva won a special election in Arizona which was certified on October 14th. Despite that win, and certification, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson is continuing to refuse to swear in an elected official, saying he will only do so when the government opens.

    The Shutdown Continues

    The government shutdown has continued into its third week. Senate Republicans could end it at any time by invoking the ‘nuclear option’ and changing the rules of the Senate. Meanwhile democrats could agree to simply approve more spending without concessions, but they are also hesitant to give up one of the few pieces of leverage they have.

    Farewell East Wing

    The East Wing of the White House has been demolished to make room for Donald Trump’s ballroom. I truly do not know who should get to decide on renovations and architectural changes to the White House, but I do know it feels wrong that the President gets to do it entirely on his own.

    President Trump demands $230 million from DOJ

    This week it has come to light that Donald Trump has requested the Department of Justice give him $230 million for past cases against him. Given the control he has asserted over the DOJ with Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche in charge, it sure feels like he is asking his own lawyers to decide if he should get free taxpayer money from the American public.

    New Media at the Pentagon

    Last week, I was heartened to see many media organizations hand in their press credentials instead of capitulating to new rules at the Pentagon. Now, an entirely new, Trump-Friendly press arrangement has been added to the Pentagon. I hope we continue to see good journalism reporting on important matters from the Department.

    The White House Continues Attacking Boats

    The United States has continued attacking boats in international waters and claiming they were drug smugglers but providing no evidence of their claims.

    Sources:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/20/us/appeals-court-national-guard-troops-portland-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.v08.04_4.hdY73WnCdNhv&smid=url-share

    10 U.S. Code § 12406 – National Guard in Federal service: call | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

    9th Circuit rules that National Guard can deploy to Portland : NPR

    https://azluminaria.org/2025/09/24/arizona-district-7-special-election-results-2025-grijalva-butierez/

    Adelita Grijalva election win officially certified, still not sworn in

    Speaker Johnson continues to resist swearing in Democratic Rep.-elect Grijalva – ABC News

    What to know about Pam Bondi, Trump’s attorney general pick | AP News

    Three things to know about Todd Blanche, Trump’s pick for deputy attorney general

    White House East Wing demolished, new images appear to show – ABC News

    9 things to know about the $250 million ballroom Trump is adding to the White House | PBS News

    Trump’s White House demolition couldn’t be stopped. Here’s why.

    Government hits longest full shutdown in US history with no end in sight | Fox News

    What Is the ‘Nuclear Option’? Republicans Invoke It Again | TIME

    Democrats voted for a shutdown and now have to find a way out | AP News

    Journalists exit Pentagon rather than agree to new reporting rules | AP News

    Pro-Trump outlets flock to the Pentagon under new media policy – POLITICO

    US strikes two more alleged drug-carrying boats | AP News

    Fact-checking Trump’s claim that each boat strike off Venezuela’s coast saves 25,000 lives | PBS News

    October 24, 2025
  • Pam Bondi Testifies to the Judiciary Committee

    On Tuesday, Attorney General Pam Bondi testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee.  If you want to watch the entire hearing, it is available on CSPAN, though I cannot say I recommend subjecting yourself to the experience.

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion to this post.

    In a recent post, I talked about how I find the designation of Antifa as a terrorist organization to be terrifying.  A brief exchange between Senator Mazie Hirono and AG Bondi does a good job of exemplifying what I find to be scary about this designation.  As Antifa doesn’t seem to have any central organization, it is easy to make broad claims that anything, or anyone, you don’t like is a member – and Bondi suggests in this clip that Senator Hirono was “protesting with Antifa”.

    Yesterday, Donald Trump participated in a round table about Antifa.  As part of that round table, Jack Posobiec discussed the origins of Antifa being in the Weimar Republic in Germany and Bella Ciao being the anthem for Antifa.  He is right that the song is well-known and sung annually in Italy to “commemorate the liberation of Italy from Nazi occupation”.  I should note here that Jack Posobiec is a co-author of the book Unhumans which praises authoritarians throughout history and suggests we need to suppress opposing views.

    Donald Trump also suggested both Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson should be jailed during the round table discussion.  As we see attacks build on anyone who dares stand up to the Executive Branch, the resemblance to the House Un-American Activities Committee is striking.

     

    Sources:

    3 takeaways from Bondi’s combative DOJ oversight hearing | PBS News

    Attorney General Pam Bondi Testifies at Department of Justice Oversight Hearing | Video | C-SPAN.org

    News of the Week: 9/23 – Politically Rational

    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Designates Antifa as a Domestic Terrorist Organization – The White House

    User Clip: Pam Bondi – Mazie Hirono | Video | C-SPAN.org

    What is Antifa and why is Donald Trump targeting it?

    President Trump Participates in a Roundtable on Antifa | Video | C-SPAN.org

    User Clip: Jack Posobiec discusses Antifa | Video | C-SPAN.org

    Italian song ‘Bella Ciao’ lyrics implicated in Charlie Kirk’s killing : NPR

    Unhumans – Wikipedia

    ‘Unhumans’: the far-right conspiracists manifesto endorsed by JD Vance

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/08/us/politics/trump-pritzker-chicago-ice.html?unlocked_article_code=1.sE8.SZ2G.U9Ml5Vvw2Ttc&smid=url-share

    House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) | History & Facts | Britannica

    October 9, 2025
  • News of the Week: 9/23

    I have written a lot today, and much of it on rather sensitive topics and I hope you take the time to read it all.

    Every post I write, I make sure to include an invitation for civil and bipartisan discussion.  I do so because I truly believe that we are all closer together than it feels, that it is important to be able to have a free flow of discussion and ideas, and because I think civil bipartisanship is necessary for us to thrive.  With that in mind:

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    It has been well over a week since I have written a weekly update with my commentary on recent news.  There has again been a lot of news, and I sincerely hope you take the time to read all that I have written.

     

    Designating Antifa as Terrorist Organization

    There has been a lot of talk recently about Donald Trump designating “Antifa” as a terrorist organization.  Earlier this year, President Trump formally designated cartels as terrorist organizations, which he has the authority to do under Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.  However, one of the three provisions for such a designation requires the organization to be foreign; there is no such authority granted the executive branch for domestic organizations.

    While writing this, the executive order has been signed.  The best descriptions I can find of what Antifa actually is typically use a variation of this BBC article: “Antifa is short for anti-fascist. It is a loose, leaderless affiliation of mostly far-left activists” and Christopher Wray, former FBI Director, noted it is an ideology, not an organization.

    Over the past several years, Donald Trump claimed Antifa was involved with the January 6th storming of the capitol, behind the George Floyd protests, and that they were part of the violence in Charlottesville.

    This designation is terrifying.

    Although this order is officially toothless as there is no formal definition in the United States for a Domestic Terror Organization, we have already seen the President use military force on a Venezuelan boat, a second Venezuelan boat, a third Venezuelan boat, and threaten military action in Mexico, authorize force against cartels in Mexico while the Vice President says he “doesn’t give a shit” if it is a war crime.

    With this administration’s willingness to make claims without verification, this type of designation could be used to call anyone who disagrees with the President Antifa, and therefore a domestic terrorist, without any evidence.

    That is terrifying.

     

    Charlie Kirk Funeral Service

    On Sunday, a funeral service for Charlie Kirk was held at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona.  Before saying any more, I would like to reiterate what I posted after his death:

    “𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠. 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐝. 𝐈𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐟 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐝.” – Juliette Kayyem, former assistant secretary of Homeland Security.

    Over the past few weeks, we have seen a lot of backlash from people who appear to be glorifying the death of Charlie Kirk.  That includes lawmakers in Iowa who have pushed to fire teachers due to their comments, and Glenn Beck plainly stating, “Celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk is not free speech.”

    While I could never dream of condoning any kind of political violence, this idea is hardly new.  Famed lawyer Clarence Darrow once wrote, “I have never killed any one, but I have read some obituary notices with great satisfaction.”*

    Earlier this summer, President Trump was asked about feeling sorry for Joe Biden on account of his cancer diagnosis.  The President said he doesn’t feel sorry for him because he is vicious.  Yesterday, at Kirk’s funeral, Donald Trump disagreed with him, saying instead,  “I hate my opponent and I don’t want the best for them.”

    I would like to again repeat: Political Violence is wrong, no matter what side or what beliefs.

     

    Jimmy Kimmel suspended indefinitely

    During his monologue, Jimmy Kimmel touched on the topic of the response to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.  If you have not actually watched the entire monologue, and you have followed the ensuing discussion, I highly recommend watching it start to finish.

    After the show aired, FCC Director, Brendan Carr suggested affiliates should pull Kimmel off air, Nexstar announced it would no longer air the show, along with Sinclair, and ultimately Disney suspended Kimmel indefinitely.

    According to Bantam Books v. Sullivan, informal censorship from government violates the constitutionally protected freedom of speech.  Moreover, this opinion was upheld last year in a 9-0 decision NRA v Vullo, in which the opinion read, “Bantam Books stands for the principle that a government official cannot do indirectly what she is barred from doing directly: A government official cannot coerce a private party to punish or suppress disfavored speech on her behalf.”

    As Sinclair is pursuing possible mergers and Nexstar has one pending, it certainly appears the comments of the FCC director were intended to persuade Kimmel’s removal.

    Of course, Disney has now reinstated Kimmel, but Sinclair reportedly will not air Kimmel on their local affiliates and there is no word from Sinclair on the matter.

     

    A new H1-B Visa fee of $100,000 was implemented

    President Trump has signed an executive order adding a $100,000 fee to any new H1-B Visa.  This fee is entirely unrelated to the fee structure that already exists for H1-B Visas, and it is unclear if this new condition is legal.

    Regardless of legality, I want to focus on one line in the executive order.

    The restriction imposed pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall not apply to any individual alien, all aliens working for a company, or all aliens working in an industry, if the Secretary of Homeland Security determines, in the Secretary’s discretion, that the hiring of such aliens to be employed as H-1B specialty occupation workers is in the national interest and does not pose a threat to the security or welfare of the United States.

    Let’s be clear what this means: If the President decides a company should be exempt from paying this fine, for whatever reason he decides, he can waive this fee.  In other words, this invites companies to bend over backwards to stay in the President’s good graces in order to remain exempt from paying fees.

    This is an attempt to force companies to do what he wants them to do.

     

    *I initially looked for the source of “I would never wish for anyone to die, but I have ready many obituaries with great pleasure” by Mark Twain, but instead found the Snopes article in the sources indicating it was a misattribution.

     

    Sources:

    Multiple local news stations say the same thing verbatim

    Trump says he’ll designate antifa as a terrorist group | AP News

    Designating Cartels And Other Organizations As Foreign Terrorist Organizations And Specially Designated Global Terrorists – The White House

    The Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) List | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

    8 U.S. Code § 1189 – Designation of foreign terrorist organizations | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Designates Antifa as a Domestic Terrorist Organization – The White House

    What is Antifa and why is Donald Trump targeting it?

    FBI director says antifa is an ideology, not an organization | AP News

    Trump falsely claims FBI and Antifa were ‘leading the charge’ in Capitol attack | The Independent

    President Trump Stands By Original Charlottesville Remarks : NPR

    https://www.npr.org/2025/09/19/nx-s1-5547149/trump-used-the-military-to-target-a-venezuelan-vessel-is-it-legal

    Trump announces new strike on Venezuelan boat and death of three ‘narcoterrorists’ | The Independent

    Trump Says US Forces Sank Third Suspected Drug Boat off Venezuela | Military.com

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/09/19/trump-cartel-strikes-mexico-dea/

    Trump approves military action against cartel terrorist organizations | Fox News

    JD Vance blasts Trump critic in cartel killings debate: ‘I don’t give a s—‘ | Fox News

    Charlie Kirk memorial service start time, speakers, where to watch

    Inside Iowa Politics: Why lawmaker wants educators fired for Charlie Kirk social media posts

    Charlie Kirk’s death exposes the line between speech and glorifying violence | Blaze Media

    Clarence Darrow – Wikipedia

    Did Mark Twain Say ‘I Have Read Some Obituaries With Great Pleasure’? | Snopes.com

    Biden has been diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer | AP News

    Trump: ‘Don’t Feel So Sorry’ For Biden Because Of Stage 4 Cancer

    WATCH: Trump ‘authentically himself’ for saying he hates opponents at Kirk funeral, White House says | PBS News

    Trump Grieves By Talking About $200 Million Ballroom, MAGA Hits New Lows & Guillermo at the Emmys – YouTube

    How Brendan Carr, the attack-dog FCC chair, helped take down Jimmy Kimmel with words, not actions | CNN Business

    Nexstar ABC Affiliates To Preempt “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” Indefinitely Beginning Tonight | Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

    Sinclair Warned ABC It Planned to Drop Kimmel, Says Suspension ‘Not Enough’

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/18/entertainment/abc-jimmy-kimmel-what-comes-next

    Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan – Wikipedia

    National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo – Wikipedia

    Sinclair is exploring merger options for its broadcast business

    Nexstar Tegna $3.54 billion deal

    ABC ends Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, says his late-night show will return Tuesday | PBS News

    Sinclair Local TV Stations Will Not Air Jimmy Kimmel Return to ABC

    Trump’s new $100K fee on H-1B visas will hurt tech companies : NPR

    Trump’s Immigration Overhaul Of H-1B, EB-5 To Spark Legal Firestorm

    Restriction on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers – The White House

     

    September 23, 2025
←Previous Page
1 2 3 4 … 14
Next Page→

Politically Rational

This site is intended to be a civil, rational approach to discussing American Politics, regardless of party affiliation.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress