Politically Rational

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • One Year of Posting

    According to Facebook, today marks one year since I created a Facebook page, and therefore this website. That really comes as little surprise as my first political post was shortly after the second inauguration of President Trump, and I created the page

    ๐ˆ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ๐ž ๐œ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฅ, ๐›๐ข๐ฉ๐š๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐š๐ง ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐œ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ.

    The first few times I wrote something it was because I was frustrated with the political environment. I was frustrated that Congress was not stepping up to fulfill their obligations. Above all else, I was frustrated that people were simply attacking each other rather than listening to one another.

    I have said it many times over the past year, but I still firmly believe that the ideologies of ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐ž๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ž ๐ฌ๐ž๐ž ๐จ๐ง ๐š ๐๐š๐ข๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐›๐š๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ, ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐š๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐š๐ซ ๐š๐ฉ๐š๐ซ๐ญ.

    Politicians in search of soundbites and campaign slogans have long sought to vastly oversimplify the details of the proposals they support. Bills in Congress that are thousands of pages long are often reduced to a small number of talking points; in reality, they can encompass hundreds or thousands of different political positions and represent long-debated compromises while being drafted.

    ๐ˆ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐›๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ฏ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ž ๐ง๐ž๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฅ๐จ๐จ๐ค ๐ฉ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐›๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ฑ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ง๐ฎ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐ข๐ง ๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฅ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.

    Over the past year I have written around 50 posts in total. I have read a number of books about politics and history. I have done my best to elicit dialogue between left and right.

    Moreover, I have thought about what purpose I have in writing my thoughts on a regular basis. I would love to see more discussion and ๐ก๐ž๐ฅ๐ฉ ๐ซ๐ž๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ง๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐ง๐ฎ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐ข๐ง ๐š ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐œ๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ ๐›๐ž๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฉ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐›๐ฅ๐š๐œ๐ค ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ž.

    However, at the end of the day, a large part of the reason I write is to be introspective. Many days ๐ข๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ž๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ค๐ž ๐ˆ ๐š๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐ฏ๐จ๐ข๐, but I have come to appreciate doing so for my own sake.

    I am currently reading the book Moon and Sixpence by William Somerset Maugham. I wouldn’t necessarily recommend it, but I do find many passages in his book resonate very well with me, and this explanation felt very familiar:

    โ€œIt is a salutary discipline to consider the vast number of books that are written, the fair hopes with which their authors see them published, and the fate which awaits them. What chance is there that any book will make its way among that multitude? And the successful books are but the successes of a season. Heaven knows what pains the author has been at, what bitter experiences he has endured and what heartache suffered, to give some chance reader a few hours’ relaxation or to while away the tedium of a journey. And if I may judge from the reviews, many of these books are well and carefully written; much thought has gone to their composition; to some even has been given the anxious labour of a lifetime. ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ ๐๐ซ๐š๐ฐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฐ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ž๐ค ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐›๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ž๐ง ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ; ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐š๐ฎ๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ž, ๐œ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐  ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐š๐ข๐ฌ๐ž ๐จ๐ซ ๐œ๐ž๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž, ๐Ÿ๐š๐ข๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐œ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ.โ€

    Thank you to everyone who has read my thoughts over the past year. I have appreciated the opportunity to scream into the void and release the burden of my thoughts, and I look forward to continuing to do so.

    March 25, 2026
  • RE: Bondi

    A few weeks ago, I wrote about Attorney General Pam Bondi’s hearing before a House Oversight Committee, particularly regarding her combative attitude and refusal to answer any questions she didn’t like.

    Contempt of Congress

    I wrote my representation in Congress on to ask for their opinions on February 17th, and I would like to take a moment to share the message I sent, and the replies I received from each of Senators Grassley and Ernst, and Representative Nunn.

    ๐ˆ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ๐ž ๐œ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฅ, ๐›๐ข๐ฉ๐š๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐š๐ง ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐œ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ.

    Zach Nunn responded first, on March 4th. Representative Nunn did not mention the Congressional testimony one single time and stated only that he agreed with me that those involved with Epstein need to be held accountable and that transparency is not optional. While I certainly agree there should be transparency, I do not see him fighting to release the rest of the files and, ๐ก๐ž ๐ฅ๐ž๐Ÿ๐ญ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ง๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐.

    Joni Ernst replied next, on March 10th. Senator Ernst did mention that some people were unsatisfied with the release of the Epstein files thus far, and stated simply that AG Bondi testified, but ๐ฌ๐ก๐ž, ๐ญ๐จ๐จ, ๐ฅ๐ž๐Ÿ๐ญ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฎ๐ง๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐.

    Finally, I received an answer from Chuck Grassley on March 12th, nearly a month after my inquiry. In line with his peers, ๐’๐ž๐ง๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐†๐ซ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฒ ๐š๐ฅ๐ฌ๐จ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐š๐๐๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง ๐€๐† ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ข’๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ฒ. He did, however, lean very much into the divisive rhetoric from the White house, stating that the Department of Justice under the Biden Administration was โ€œ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐โ€ and suggested that under Pam Bondi, a โ€œ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฐ๐š๐ฒโ€.

    Please read the responses from our members of Congress here in Iowa and let me know what you think of their โ€œanswersโ€. Let me know what responses you have received, and what questions you have been asking.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    March 16, 2026
  • More Thoughts on Iran

    Again, I would like to start out by saying; above all else, I really hope this situation in the Middle East can somehow work towards bringing lasting peace and stability to the region.

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    I had some more brief thoughts on the decision by Donald Trump to strike Iran:

    • Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran, which came with significant risk; namely the risk that Iran would try to develop nuclear weaponry.
    • Claims that the United States gave Iran money in that deal are deeply misleading, as the U.S. unfroze Iranian assets โ€“ they did not hand money to Iran.
    • Donald Trump and his administration claimed in June 2025 that Iranโ€™s nuclear program was completely obliterated. The headline literally reads, โ€œIranโ€™s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated โ€” and Suggestions Otherwise are Fake Newsโ€
    • The Trump administration briefed Congressional staff stating that Iran was not preparing to launch strikes against U.S. interests.

    Moreover, I am unclear what the actual objective ย is:

    • Donald Trump suggested regime change by telling the Iranian people โ€œtake back your countryโ€.
    • Pete Hegseth said it is โ€œnot a so-called regime change warโ€
    • President Trump suggested the goal was to stop Iranian nuclear weapons programs โ€“ which, again, was said to be completely obliterated.

    Do you want regime change?ย  Are we targeting missiles, or nuclear weapons capabilities, or the navy?ย  Are we trying to establish a new government?ย ย 

    I certainly do not fully trust Iranian governmentโ€™s word on civilian casualties, but the report that a school was hit during these strikes is concerning.ย  However, it certainly does not seem like Pete Hegseth is concerned about following international law and minimizing civilian harm when he said:

    โ€œNo stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no politically-correct wars. We fight to win.โ€

    I donโ€™t know exactly what Secretary Hegseth is referring to, but it certainly sounds ominous.ย  I, for one, would like to believe the United States will follow the Geneva Convention and do everything in their power to minimize collateral damage.

     

    Sources:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/world/middleeast/trump-iran-nuclear-deal.html?unlocked_article_code=1.QFA.RCqT.unZfRtxH9pTf&smid=url-share

    Trump’s plan for the Iran nuclear deal comes with huge risks

    Fact Check: Did the US Under Obama Give Iran $150 Billion? – Newsweek

    Iranโ€™s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated โ€” and Suggestions Otherwise are Fake News โ€“ The White House

    https://abcnews.com/International/live-updates/iran-live-updates-israel-launches-preemptive-strike-iran/?id=130301492&entryId=130677137

    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/28/us/politics/trump-iran-messaging-broadcasting.html?unlocked_article_code=1.QVA.X8Wl.VzkLmuqVjZlW&smid=url-share

    Hegseth defends US attack on Iran as ‘our retribution’ – ABC News

    Trump Seeks to Justify Iran War, but Stated Objectives Shift

    More Than 100 Reported Killed in Strike on Girlsโ€™ School in Iran. Here’s What We Know | TIME

    WATCH: Hegseth insists the Iran conflict is ‘not Iraq’ and is ‘not endless’ | PBS News

     

     

    March 3, 2026
  • To Declare War

    The Congress shall have the power… To declare War.

    U.S. Constitution: Article I, Section 8

    For the second time already this year, the United States military has launched a major operation which removed a foreign leader from power. On January 3rd, the U.S. Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who now is in the United States awaiting trial. Now, on February 28th, the U.S. launched strikes into Iran killing their supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei.

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    The Maduro regime was not considered by the United States to be legitimately elected, a position made clear by the Biden Administration when they sanctioned Maduro and many of his associates and even offering a $25 million reward for information leading to his arrest.

    Military operations in Venezuela should have been authorized by Congress.

    Iran has long had tensions with the United States, have been behind a lot of strikes on U.S. forces and allies in the middle east, and have killed thousands of their own citizens who have been protesting the authoritarian government.

    Military operations in Iran should have been authorized by Congress.

    Many republicans in Congress justified the legality of the Venezuelan action by saying it was simply an extension of the Department of Justice carrying out a warrant. Now, they are simply praising this action as necessary to stop Iranian nuclear enrichment, without commenting upon the legality of the move.

    Looking at my representation in Congress:

    Zach Nunn:

    Declaring Iran at fault and saying he โ€œdoesn’t take military action lightlyโ€.

    Chuck Grassley on X:

    โ€œCANT HV UNPRDICTABLE LEADERSHIP IN IRAN W NUCLEAR BOMBโ€

    Joni Ernst:

    Thanking our service members in the region.

    I have my own thoughts on the irony of their statements but I will let you come up with your own commentary on their respective comments. Please feel free to comment your feelings.

    None of them are commenting on the legality of such an attack, either in terms of the United States Constitution, or in terms of international law.

    This operation in Iran could go well. It could lead to the protest movement feeling increased energy, renewed optimism, and international support, ultimately ushering in a new, more tolerant and open government in Iran.

    However, this operation could also backfire. Unilaterally overthrowing the Iranian regime by killing many in leadership runs a major risk of galvanizing the people against the United States, isolating our allies, and it is possible Ayatollah Khamenei is replaced by a more hardline government.

    Under no circumstances do I condone the Venezuelan or Iranian regimes but the ramifications of these actions will be long-lasting and should not have been authorized by only a single person at the helm.

    Military operations should be debated on, and authorized by, Congress.

     

    Sources:

    U.S. Constitution | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

    U.S. strikes Venezuela and says leader Maduro has been captured and flown out of the country | PBS News

    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/02/28/world/iran-strikes-trump?unlocked_article_code=1.PlA.5L6N.3H-ma-Y1Bhl5&smid=url-share

    Biden imposes new sanctions on Maduro allies in Venezuela

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/world/americas/biden-bounty-nicolas-maduro.html?unlocked_article_code=1.P1A.Hw1O.Lb_B_sWRKXJZ&smid=url-share

    A historical timeline of U.S. relations with Iran | PBS News

    US confronts dangers from ‘not very good’ Iran-backed militants | Reuters

    Iran’s protest crackdown killed more than 7,000, activists say | AP News

    Top Republicans praise Venezuela operation as some lawmakers question legal authority

    Iran strikes were launched without approval from Congress, deeply dividing lawmakers | WUSF

    https://www.facebook.com/RepZachNunn/posts/pfbid02DPzw3Qww6iNSzkW445oin1cSM9JTwugWMYgb2RM1Q3jFj8QW5mVyL8qsKCBM8NZ6l

    Chuck Grassley on X: “Iโ€™m following closely whatโ€™s happening in Iran & the region Barbara + I are praying for the safety of our troops Regime change badly neededย +Must stop nuclear enrichment CANT HV UNPRDICTABLE LEADERSHIP IN IRAN W NUCLEAR BOMB Pres Trump gave IRAN PLENTY OF NEGOTIABLE OPPORTUNITY” / X

    https://www.facebook.com/senjoniernst/posts/pfbid02Uomuv3hUsknjU7GaVvryTtQ9E4ecJMYJAmimBY51TFumqPheBuN7cs9boP9sRAABl

    Live updates: Iran Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is dead after U.S., Israel attack

    Exclusive: Prior to Iran attacks, CIA assessed Khamenei could be replaced by hardline IRGC elements if killed, sources say | Reuters

    March 1, 2026
  • Contempt of Congress

    Last week, the House Oversight Committee voted to hold Bill Clinton (and Hillary) in Contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena to testify before a committee on the Epstein Files.

    While this hasn’t moved to a full House vote, and I think it may have been premature, I am inclined to agree with Congress โ€“ why should they get to decide the terms of their testimony? If the subpoena was illegal, as the Clintons claim, then file suit and let the courts decide.

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    In addition to legislating, oversight of the Executive Branch is one of the key functions of the United States Congress. This week, Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before a House oversight committee to discuss the Department of Justice’s handling of the exact same topic: the Epstein files.

    To give a very brief, unnecessary recap, Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on sex-trafficking charges, and died in prison, reportedly by suicide. When asked on the campaign trail if he would release the files, President Trump said, โ€œYeah, yeah I would.โ€ and ultimately signed a bill requiring the Department of Justice, led by Bondi, to release all the Epstein files after Democrats had secured enough discharge petition votes to force his hand.

    According to the bill which President Trump signed, all the Epstein files were to be released by December 19th. The ‘final’ trove of files was released on January 30th but it seems some 3 million documents were not released, and there were copious redactions, seemingly of perpetrators, and victims being easily identifiable.

    As with Bondi’s first oversight committee testimony in October, this hearing was contentious.

    • Bondi immediately attacked Rep. Jayapal โ€“ claiming her actions were theatrics and refusing to ‘get in the gutter‘ with her.
    • She attacked Rep. Raskin by calling him a ‘washed up lawyer. Not even a lawyer‘
    • Replied to Rep. Lofgren mentioning the DOJ not working with local law enforcement on immigration by stating, โ€œI find it interesting that she keeps going after Donald Trump, the greatest President in American history.โ€
    • She called Rep. Balint, a Jewish American, anti-semitic.

    I will note that I have often found many of these types of hearings to be largely theatrical. Congress members try to ask leading questions and then present their evidence to the contrary and read it into the record.

    This was different.

    This was a sitting Attorney General who came with the intention of derailing the entire purpose of the hearing, refusing to answer any questions, and ready to attack.

    Pam Bondi brought a ‘burn book‘ so she could attack each Representative who asked her questions and even went to the length of spying on what Congress members searches were when they consulted the Epstein files.

    The Oversight Committee chose to bring former President Clinton up for a vote on Contempt of Congress.

    What exactly would you call this!?

     

    On a related tangent:
    I would also like to take a second to talk about the impeachment of President Clinton. I have heard it said a million times that he was impeached due simply to having an affair (yes, in different terms). Technically, he was impeached for lying to Congress and obstruction of justice. I feel like any of those three things dramatically understates the severity of what happened. The sitting President of the United States had an affair with one of his interns.

    This is a person in the position of highest power in the country having an affair with someone whose future he had great control over. No one should minimize the significance of his actions and if he ultimately was involved with Jeffrey Epstein, that should also come to light and he should absolutely not be excused from testifying to Congress.

     

    Sources:

    House committee votes to hold Clintons in contempt of Congress in Epstein probe | PBS News

    House Oversight moves forward on contempt against both Clintons after Hillary Clinton is a no-show in Epstein probe | CNN Politics

    Clintons, former FBI directors subpoenaed in House Epstein investigation | Fox News

    Clintons: Congressional subpoenas in Epstein case ‘invalid and legally unenforceable’

    Congressional Oversight Manual | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

    Attorney General Pam Bondi Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee, Part 1 | Video | C-SPAN.org

    Attorney General Pam Bondi Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee, Part 2 | Video | C-SPAN.org

    Epstein files – Wikipedia

    Financier Jeffrey Epstein due in court over sex charges | AP News

    Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide: New details revealed – ABC News

    What Trump has said about Jeffrey Epstein over the years, including on 2024 campaign trail – ABC News

    Trump signs bill to release Epstein files | AP News

    Epstein discharge petition secures final signature needed to force House vote on releasing files – CBS News

    Trump signs bill to release Justice Department’s Epstein files

    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/01/30/us/epstein-files-release?unlocked_article_code=1.MFA.Rm4c.wNFODtxtcsDz&smid=url-share

    Key Democratic lawmakers demand DOJ explain only partial Epstein files release – ABC News

    Epstein files are ‘riddled with abnormal’ redactions, accusers say

    Epstein survivors still identifiable in document dump despite DOJ promises, attorney says

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-attorney-general-bondi-testifies-in-senate-oversight-hearing

    House hearing erupts as Bondi clashes with lawmakers | Fox News

    Pam Bondi Refuses To Answer Question About Epstein Co-Conspirators

    Rep. Jamie Raskin fires back at AG Pam Bondi after ‘washed-up’ insult

    Bondi sidesteps Epstein questions in tense Judiciary Committee hearing | PBS News

    Democrat storms out as Pam Bondi faces questions in fiery hearing – BBC News

    Pam Bondi Roasted By Lawmakers For Bringing A โ€˜Mean Girlsโ€™-Like โ€˜Burn Bookโ€™ To Hearing | HuffPost Latest News

    Bondi had list of a Democratic lawmaker’s Epstein files “search history” during Capitol Hill hearing – CBS News

    Impeachment of Bill Clinton – Wikipedia

    February 14, 2026
1 2 3 … 14
Next Pageโ†’

Politically Rational

This site is intended to be a civil, rational approach to discussing American Politics, regardless of party affiliation.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress