Politically Rational

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Collateral Damage

    Our rights should never be subject to collateral damage. 

    Today we are having our rights stripped from us as collateral damage in the name of immigration enforcement.

    I encourage civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    For the second time in a week, an individual was killed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).  Also for the second time in a week, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) immediately commented blaming the individual who was shot.  DHS pointed out that the man was “armed” and that this was a situation in which the individual wanted to “cause maximum damage and massacre law enforcement” while a bystander video (THIS VIDEO IS GRAPHIC AND I DO NOT RECOMMEND WATCHING IT) appears to show the man surrounded by officers on the ground, never touching his firearm, and shot repeatedly at point blank range.

    The man has since been identified as Alex Pretti, who was confirmed to be a U.S. Citizen, and carrying his firearm legally.  A video analysis from KCCI indicates he was trying to help up a woman who had been pushed down, he was pepper sprayed, he was knocked to the ground, an ICE agent likely removed his gun, and then, only then, he was shot.

    Immediately, before any investigation had taken place, Kristi Noem made this comment:
    “This individual who came with weapons and ammunition to stop a law enforcement operation of federal law enforcement officers committed an act of domestic terrorism. That’s the facts.”

    Whether you agree with it or not, in the United States, we have the right to keep and bear arms.

    Our rights should never be subject to collateral damage. 

    In the name of immigration enforcement, ICE drafted a memo that they are allowed to enter homes without a warrant.  Over the past few weeks, there have been reports that ICE is going door to door looking for immigrants and it was confirmed that ICE broke down the door of a U.S. Citizen and removed him from his home assuming he was here illegally.

    The fourth amendment protects against unlawful search and seizure.

    Our rights should never be subject to collateral damage.

    I am reminded of a post I wrote about Due Process in America, which is protected by our fifth amendment which clearly states, “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”  When I wrote that post, I heard a lot of, “you are defending this guy?” and people pointing to articles like this one talking about his past activities.  I did my best to explain that I was not defending him but rather I was defending due process of the law.  Whether or not he is a criminal is not for me to decide, but it should be heard in court.

    Out rights should never be subject to collateral damage.

    I am reminded of early in 2025 when the administration chose to focus on students who supported Palestine in efforts to deport people who were here legally.  I am reminded of the pressure from the Trump administration for CBS to fire Stephen Colbert.  I am reminded that just this week FCC Chair Brendan Carr said we need equal airtime for late night shows.  I am reminded that CBS pulled Inside CECOT because the Trump Administration had not yet commented meaning TV stations cannot have democrats on at all if republicans simply refuse to join.  These seem to be clear attempts to use the executive pulpit to restrict the freedom of speech.

    Our rights should never be subject to collateral damage.         

    Gregory Bovino, the Commander-at-Large for the U.S. Border Patrol said in an interview about the second amendment, “those rights don’t count when you riot and assault, delay, obstruct and impede law enforcement officers.”

    I have two thoughts on that comment.  First, our rights always count, that is why they are rights.  Second, it is terrifying that the administration decides what is considered rioting, decides what speech is antithetical to American values, decides who gets due process, and frankly, decides which laws and rights to follow.

    Our rights should never be subject to collateral damage.

    To put it simply to this administration, “Have you no sense of decency?”

     

    Sources:

    Federal agents kill another person in Minneapolis, officials say, prompting clash with protesters

    Federal agents involved in Minneapolis shooting, DHS says suspect was armed | Fox News

    https://www.npr.org/2026/01/24/nx-s1-5687276/man-shot-dead-minneapolis

    New onlooker video shows Border Patrol-involved Minneapolis shooting | Fox News Video

    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/26/us/politics/trump-minneapolis-nurse-shooting-video.html?unlocked_article_code=1.HlA._epZ.kHWoRbFDidJ8&smid=url-share

    Alex Pretti, killed by federal officer, was an ICU nurse, outdoorsman

    What we know about Alex Pretti, VA nurse killed by federal agent in Minneapolis – ABC News

    Video analysis offers context on shooting of Alex Pretti

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/second_amendment

    Internal DHS memo says ICE agents can enter homes without a judicial warrant : NPR

    ICE memo allows agents to enter homes without judicial warrant: Whistleblower complaint – ABC News

    2,000 federal agents sent to Minneapolis area to carry out ‘largest immigration operation ever,’ ICE says | PBS News

    A U.S. citizen says ICE forced open the door to his Minnesota home and removed him in his underwear after a warrantless search | PBS News

    Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution – Wikipedia

    Due Process in America – Politically Rational

    Fifth Amendment | U.S. Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

    AG Releases Police Records Detailing Garcia’s Criminal History

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/01/us/politics/student-visas-social-media.html?unlocked_article_code=1.HlA.wn2m.xmeopEOi-QLY&smid=url-share

    CBS cancels Stephen Colbert’s show days after Trump settlement criticism – POLITICO

    FCC says TV talk shows must offer equal time to political candidates – CBS News

    CBS News airs pulled ’60 Minutes’ report on CECOT in El Salvador

    Inside CECOT – Wikipedia

    First Amendment | U.S. Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

    Bovino claims Border Patrol agents are ‘the victims’ in deadly Minneapolis shooting – POLITICO

    U.S. Senate: “Have You No Sense of Decency?”

    January 27, 2026
  • Martin Luther King, Jr. Day

    “Actually, we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive. We bring it out in the open, where it can be seen and dealt with. Like a boil that can never be cured so long as it is covered up but must be opened with all its ugliness to the natural medicines of air and light, injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured.”

    • Martin Luther King, Jr.

    On this holiday weekend honoring Martin Luther King, Jr., I have been re-reading his key speeches and writings.  Most of us think immediately of I have a dream, or his comments on hate “Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Hate multiplies hate, violence multiplies violence, and toughness multiplies toughness in a descending spiral of destruction.”

    Today, I am focusing on a quote about tensions amid protest – that it is not the protest which causes tension, but only that it brings the tension to light.

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    After the ruling in Brown vs. Board of Education in 1954, there were outstanding questions as to whether desegregation only applied to education, or to all aspects of life as many cities in the south continued policies of segregation.  Led by Fred Lee Shuttlesworth, the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights began demonstrations and protests to fight the injustice of segregation in areas outside of schools.

    After losing numerous court cases, officials in Alabama started closing facilities rather than integrating.  Probably the most famous official statement in opposition to integration, in his inaugural address as Governor of Alabama, George Wallace advocated for “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”

    Shortly after Wallace’s inauguration in 1963, Martin Luther King, Jr. joined Shuttlesworth and the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights in what is now known as the Birmingham Campaign.  King, Jr. was arrested for his non-violent protests in Birmingham and was criticized by a group of Alabama clergymen for his protests which prompted his Letter from Birmingham Jail in reply, from which the passage above was taken.

    I strongly recommend reading the letter in its entirety – it touches on a lot of aspects of criticism he received: the right time to protest, the reasons that go into deciding to protest, and how “lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”

    I hope you find time for reflection today.

    Sources:

    WATCH: Dr. Martin Luther King’s ‘I Have a Dream’ Speech – Insider NJ

    King’s words still inspire nearly 50 years after his death | AP News

    Brown v. Board of Education – Wikipedia

    Fred Shuttlesworth – Wikipedia

    Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights – Encyclopedia of Alabama

    On Oct 24, 1961: Birmingham Officials Announce Plan to Close City Parks Rather Than Permit Racial Integration

    George Wallace | Biography, Facts, & 1968 Presidential Candidacy | Britannica

    George Wallace’s 1963 inaugural address – Wikipedia

    Birmingham Campaign of 1963 – Encyclopedia of Alabama

    Statement-and-Response-King-Birmingham.pdf

    https://letterfromjail.com/

    January 19, 2026
  • Does the President Want to Execute Members of Congress?

    “Does the President want to execute members of Congress?”

    This question was posed to Press Secretary Leavitt yesterday.  It is an absolutely shocking question to be asked at the White House, and it is even more shocking that it is a legitimate question.

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    Earlier this week, a group of lawmakers posted a video asking members of the American military and intelligence to disobey any illegal orders.

    It is part of the Manual for Courts Martial (Page IV-24, which is 334 of the PDF) , stating that an order must be inferred as lawful, but that such inference “does not apply to a patently illegal order, such as one that directs the commission of a crime.”  Moreover, in 1804 the Supreme Court ruled in Little v. Barreme that orders given cannot “legalize an act without which without those instructions would have been a plain trespass.”

    In direct response to their video, President Trump shared a Washington Examiner article on his Truth Social account and suggested this is seditious behavior, the people doing it are traitors, and they should be locked up.  He also shared numerous social media posts, including one calling for them to be hanged.

    The full answer to the question from Secretary Leavitt, which can be seen here, is this:

    “No. Many in this room want to talk about the president’s response, but not what brought the president to responding in this way.  To suggest and encourage that active duty service members defy the chain of command is a very dangerous thing for sitting members of Congress to do and they should be held accountable.  And that’s what the president wants to see.”

     

    Many are suggesting this comment clarifies the President’s position, but it is worth noting that all the posts shared here are still up on his Truth Social Account and he has not made any comments on the matter directly.

    Whether the video made by the democratic lawmakers was advisable, or insinuated that President Trump has been giving unlawful orders is debatable, though it is worth a reminder that when asked about the legality of striking boats in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, Vice President Vance himself simply stated, “I don’t give a shit”.

    What is not debatable is that the lawmakers in question only reiterated that our service members should not follow orders that are illegal, which is standard practice.  In fact, the Supreme Court explicitly stated in Little v. Barreme, “the instructions cannot change the nature of the transaction, or legalize an act which without those instructions would have been a plain trespass.”

    It can hardly be considered sedition or treason to suggest our service members follow the law.  Suggesting lawmakers be executed for such statements is bewildering.

    I remain shocked that we have come to the point where asking the question, “Does the President want to execute members of Congress?” is a legitimate question.

     

     

     

    Sources:

    Sen. Elissa Slotkin on X: “We want to speak directly to members of the Military and the Intelligence Community. The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution. Don’t give up the ship. https://t.co/N8lW0EpQ7r” / X

    Democratic lawmakers urge troops to disobey illegal orders | CNN Politics

    MCM (2024 ed) – TOC no index.pdf

    Little v. Barreme – Wikipedia

    Dem veterans in Congress urge service members to refuse unlawful orders

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-arrest-democrats-troops-illegal-orders-b2869176.html

    Trump Boosts Message Calling For Executing Democrats In Congress | HuffPost Latest News

    Video | Facebook

    White House defends Donald Trump remarks, says he does not want member of Congress executed

    Trump calls video by Democratic veterans in Congress ‘seditious behavior’ : NPR

    Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Truth Social

    U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats: What we know : NPR

    JD Vance blasts Trump critic in cartel killings debate: ‘I don’t give a s—‘ | Fox News

    LITTLE v. BARREME, 6 U.S. 170 (1804) | FindLaw

     

    November 21, 2025
  • Is Senator Grassley Paying Attention?

    It seems like now is a good time for a reminder of comments made by Senator Chuck Grassley back in February regarding President Trump disobeying court orders:  “He wouldn’t get away with that and shouldn’t.”

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion to this post.

    I first wrote about this administration’s seeming defiance of the judiciary back in February and many of the concerns I raised have simply increased since then.  Over the course of Trump’s second administration, we have seen a number of judicial rulings against the Trump Administration.  I want to highlight just a few recent cases.

    I hope Senator Grassley is paying attention.

    National Guard Troops in Portland:

    At the end of September, President Trump ordered national guard troops into Portland, Oregon.  On October 4th, a federal judge ruled it was illegal for the Oregon National Guard to be sent in.  Almost immediately, President Trump moved to send the California National Guard into Portland instead which was immediately determined to violate the previous order and also ruled illegal.  Now, a ruling has permanently blocked the President from using National Guard forces in Portland, partly because another court determined the administration erred about the facts while arguing their case in court.

    I hope Senator Grassley is paying attention.

    SNAP Benefits:

    Earlier this week, a judge ruled that the Trump administration must partially fund SNAP benefits.  Immediately following the ruling, Donald Trump posted that he would not fund those benefits.  After a review of his comments, the same judge who ruled on partial funding said the administration must provide those benefits in full.  After another appeal, that ruling has been paused for now by Justice Jackson of the Supreme Court in order to give an appeals court more time to make a ruling.

    I hope Senator Grassley is paying attention.

     

    Other Comments:

    I should note that each state has taken a different path on funding SNAP benefits.  Living in Iowa, I will note that Governor Reynolds has put forward $1 million for food banks during the lapse in SNAP benefits but only in the form of matching donations to Iowa’s six regional food banks while Iowa’s SNAP total is approximately $45 million per month.

     

     

    Sources:

    Grassley expects Trump to follow court orders on federal spending

    Blog – Page 11 of 12 – Politically Rational

    More than 100 judges have ruled against the Trump admin’s mandatory detention policy – POLITICO

    Trump says he is authorizing military to use ‘Full Force’ in Portland – POLITICO

    Illinois files a lawsuit to block Trump deploying the National Guard, joining Oregon | WBUR

    Pentagon says it is deploying California National Guard to Portland | Reuters

    Federal judge blocks federalized guard from deploying to Oregon – OPB

    Judge permanently blocks Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops to Portland – CBS News

    9th Circuit reverses victory for Trump admin after feds lied

    Trump administration says SNAP will be partially funded | AP News

    Trump links SNAP program restart to Democrat government shutdown decision | Fox News

    Judge orders Trump administration to fully fund SNAP benefits for November by Friday – CBS News

    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/11/07/us/trump-news-shutdown?unlocked_article_code=1.zk8.2jQ_.FKzDlz5tfMY1&smid=url-share

    SNAP benefits: These states will partially fund food stamps amid shutdown | FOX 13 Tampa Bay

    Reynolds pledges funding to assist food banks after SNAP funding expires | Iowa Public Radio

    Reynolds pledges funding to assist food banks after SNAP funding expires | Iowa Public Radio

    State Data | Iowa Food Bank Association

    SNAP benefits to run out amid government shutdown. Here’s what to know

     

    November 8, 2025
  • Another Week of Chaos

    We have seen yet another week (or slightly more) of total chaos in the United States government: from nationwide protests to the demolition of part of the White House to one of the longest government shutdowns we’ve ever seen, the news keeps coming at a pace that is difficult to keep up with.

    I invite civil, bipartisan discussion on this post.

    National Guard and Portland

    This week, an appeals court ruled that Donald Trump can deploy the National Guard in Portland. The President does have the authority to deploy the national guard in the event there is “rebellion or danger of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.” The President’s legal team essentially argued that he alone has the authority to determine the facts and whether there is danger of rebellion.

    Mike Johnson vs Adelita Grijalva

    On September 24th, Adelita Grijalva won a special election in Arizona which was certified on October 14th. Despite that win, and certification, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson is continuing to refuse to swear in an elected official, saying he will only do so when the government opens.

    The Shutdown Continues

    The government shutdown has continued into its third week. Senate Republicans could end it at any time by invoking the ‘nuclear option’ and changing the rules of the Senate. Meanwhile democrats could agree to simply approve more spending without concessions, but they are also hesitant to give up one of the few pieces of leverage they have.

    Farewell East Wing

    The East Wing of the White House has been demolished to make room for Donald Trump’s ballroom. I truly do not know who should get to decide on renovations and architectural changes to the White House, but I do know it feels wrong that the President gets to do it entirely on his own.

    President Trump demands $230 million from DOJ

    This week it has come to light that Donald Trump has requested the Department of Justice give him $230 million for past cases against him. Given the control he has asserted over the DOJ with Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche in charge, it sure feels like he is asking his own lawyers to decide if he should get free taxpayer money from the American public.

    New Media at the Pentagon

    Last week, I was heartened to see many media organizations hand in their press credentials instead of capitulating to new rules at the Pentagon. Now, an entirely new, Trump-Friendly press arrangement has been added to the Pentagon. I hope we continue to see good journalism reporting on important matters from the Department.

    The White House Continues Attacking Boats

    The United States has continued attacking boats in international waters and claiming they were drug smugglers but providing no evidence of their claims.

    Sources:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/20/us/appeals-court-national-guard-troops-portland-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.v08.04_4.hdY73WnCdNhv&smid=url-share

    10 U.S. Code § 12406 – National Guard in Federal service: call | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

    9th Circuit rules that National Guard can deploy to Portland : NPR

    https://azluminaria.org/2025/09/24/arizona-district-7-special-election-results-2025-grijalva-butierez/

    Adelita Grijalva election win officially certified, still not sworn in

    Speaker Johnson continues to resist swearing in Democratic Rep.-elect Grijalva – ABC News

    What to know about Pam Bondi, Trump’s attorney general pick | AP News

    Three things to know about Todd Blanche, Trump’s pick for deputy attorney general

    White House East Wing demolished, new images appear to show – ABC News

    9 things to know about the $250 million ballroom Trump is adding to the White House | PBS News

    Trump’s White House demolition couldn’t be stopped. Here’s why.

    Government hits longest full shutdown in US history with no end in sight | Fox News

    What Is the ‘Nuclear Option’? Republicans Invoke It Again | TIME

    Democrats voted for a shutdown and now have to find a way out | AP News

    Journalists exit Pentagon rather than agree to new reporting rules | AP News

    Pro-Trump outlets flock to the Pentagon under new media policy – POLITICO

    US strikes two more alleged drug-carrying boats | AP News

    Fact-checking Trump’s claim that each boat strike off Venezuela’s coast saves 25,000 lives | PBS News

    October 24, 2025
←Previous Page
1 2 3 4 … 14
Next Page→

Politically Rational

This site is intended to be a civil, rational approach to discussing American Politics, regardless of party affiliation.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress